For organizations operating complex digital ecosystems, value rarely comes from isolated decisions. It comes from how well those decisions compound over time. Platforms evolve, integrations multiply, teams change, and systems that once felt sufficient quietly become constraints. In that environment, the difference between a vendor and a long-term digital partner is not technical capability alone – it is understanding.
At Five Jars, in-depth interviews are one of the ways we build that understanding. Not to inform about a specific project or validate a roadmap, but to learn how our clients actually live with their digital systems day after day. These sessions focus on context: what existed before we arrived, where friction has become routine, what compromises teams have learned to accept, and why certain decisions now feel difficult to undo.
Why traditional conversations miss what matters
Most client meetings happen “under pressure”, meaning there is a timeline to meet, a scope to finalize, or an issue to resolve. These discussions are necessary, but they are also limiting.
They tend to surface:
- What needs to happen next
- What is blocked right now
- What cannot change
They rarely surface:
- What already failed quietly
- What teams stopped questioning
- What everyone assumes but no one has articulated
In-depth interviews create a different space. When people are not required to justify decisions or defend plans, a different kind of information emerges – information that explains why things are the way they are.
Context is often a missing layer
Solution development is often framed as a series of upgrades: improved performance, a refreshed interface, and/or new integrations. Without context, these changes remain surface-level. They address what is visible, not what actually shapes how systems are used and maintained over time.
Through in-depth interviews, we gain visibility into:
- Why were certain platforms chosen in the first place
- What expectations did they create internally
- Where friction is tolerated instead of addressed
- Which decisions feel irreversible, and which are simply waiting for the right moment
This context directly shapes how we work going forward:
- Architecture becomes more intentional
- Integrations focus on removing effort, not adding complexity
- Support and maintenance prioritize what actually slows teams down
- Strategic advice reflects organizational reality, not ideal scenarios
Best practices for meaningful strategic sessions
In-depth interviews create value not because of how they are structured, but because of the conditions they establish. The most useful insights rarely come from perfectly phrased questions. They emerge when people feel they can speak openly, reflect honestly on past experience, and describe how work actually happens, without the pressure to justify decisions or defend outcomes.
When interviews are framed as a space for understanding rather than judgment, they allow teams to surface realities that usually remain unspoken. This is where strategic clarity begins.
What makes in-depth interviews effective:
- Space to speak without needing to decide anything immediately
- Willingness to reflect on past and present experience, not future plans
- Representation across roles, not just leadership
- Openness to discussing trade-offs and constraints, not only goals
What helps most:
- Concrete examples instead of general statements
- Talking about what actually happens, not what should happen
- Acknowledging compromises without assigning blame
These conversations work best when they are treated as shared exploration rather than evaluation, an opportunity to understand context together before any conclusions are drawn.
Why there is no immediate “output”
In-depth interviews do not produce a report, a score, or a checklist – and that is intentional. Their value lies in what they enable later:
- Clearer conversations
- Sharper judgment
- Fewer assumptions
- More relevant decisions
Over time, this shared understanding builds upon itself. Advice lands better. Trade-offs become explicit earlier. Collaboration becomes smoother not because it is simpler, but because it is more grounded.
How in-depth interviews change a partnership over time
The impact of these conversations is rarely immediate or dramatic. Instead, clients tend to notice small but meaningful shifts in how work unfolds over time, often without a clear moment when the change occurred.
Common effects include:
- Less need to re-explain context
- Earlier alignment on priorities
- Fewer reactive decisions
- More confidence in long-term direction
- More value that we can provide on multiple levels
As shared context accumulates, interactions become more deliberate. Work moves away from transactional problem-solving and toward a steadier mode of decision-making – one that accounts for complexity, history, and long-term implications rather than addressing symptoms in isolation.
A practice, not a phase
In-depth interviews are not tied to a specific moment or milestone. Organizations change. Teams evolve. Context shifts. Listening has to continue.
For Five Jars, this practice helps ensure that our work – across platforms, integrations, support, and strategy – stays relevant as client organizations grow and adapt.
Because the real work does not begin with a project.
It begins with understanding.
***
If this approach feels familiar or is missing in your current digital efforts, we’re open to continuing the conversation. Reach out to our team to explore different ways of collaboration, whether that involves strategic conversations, ongoing support, system evolution, or more focused initiatives.
